August
9, 2001 - The New York Times
A Man, a
Plan, a Manuscript
By CHRISTOPHER BUCKLEY
To: William Jefferson
Clinton
From: Bob Gottlieb, Random House
Re: The Manuscript
Dear Mr. President,
I read it straight through, which
I almost never do. Since it
is an important book, I read it
more slowly than I usually
read, and reached Page 2,826 this
morning just before
dawn, with the result that I have
now been up for four
nights without sleep and probably
will make no sense, but
I wanted to get some thoughts down
on paper before I
collapse of dehydration and
exhaustion. But that's my problem, not
yours.
First, it's brilliant. More
brilliant than I had any hope -
or right - to expect. While I
can't speak for Sonny Mehta,
I know that he too will think it's
brilliant.
All right. Now you know I think
it's brilliant. What didn't I
like or "get," or what
did I miss or want more of or less
of? I've been asking myself those
questions and still don't
have any answers. So why don't I
just plunge in?
I think the idea of telling it
from Monica's point of view
has wonderful potential. Knopf is
a literary house and
shouldn't be afraid of taking
risks. That said, we might run
the risk of confusing some people.
But then some people
want to be confused. It's what
makes them cute.
I've seldom read a presidential
memoir in which the
female characters are so well
developed. The chapters on
Gennifer Flowers reminded me of
Colette. Yet I wonder
- and I'm only wondering here - if
she deserves six
chapters of her own. But again I
could be wrong.
What did I miss? I missed any
mention of your brilliant
stewardship of the Nafta
legislation, of the way you
brought everyone to the table when
Mexico was about to
default on its loans. My memory is
hazy to be sure, but
didn't you solve that situation?
Didn't it go away? Aren't
the Mexicans happy now? Aside from
the trucks thing.
While I'm on it, I missed Bob
Rubin. I mean, I know Bob
and think he's terrific, but I
missed him in the book. He
was your secretary of the Treasury
for years, and yet I can
only find one mention of him, on
Page 786. Was he, after
all, not that hands-on? If so - if
not - shouldn't we say
something about this?
The chapters on Kathleen Willey,
switching to her voice,
were fascinating, but wouldn't 25
pages do for this instead of 246?
I could be wrong. I want to talk
to Sonny about this. I
know that he's been talking to the
Oprah people and they
are looking for this sort of
thing. Still, I feel we might
want to leave some room - if only
just a mention here
and there - for the health care
reform business, gays in
the military, welfare reform, the
Camp David Middle East
summit and the creation of 30
million new jobs. While I
agree with you that that's
"boring," it doesn't have to
be.
Even so, I do feel that the
reviewers might care.
What readers surely would not find
"boring" was the
brilliant way you dealt with Newt
Gingrich. I had to
search for any mention of him, and
finally found two, on
Pages 1,433 and 1,599, where you
briefly allude to
wanting to slam Air Force One's
door on his "chubby
fingers." That's a great
moment, and I missed seeing it more fully
developed.
In looking for some mention of
other big players - Alan
Greenspan, Al Gore (are they all
named Al in Washington
these days?) - I sometimes felt
that I was playing that
game "Where's Waldo?"
Greenspan may be - I found him
on Page 1,703 - as you say,
"gaga" on the subject of Ayn
Rand, but I at least wanted to
hear much more about that,
and I'll bet Sonny would, too.
I'm rambling. The first thing I
want to do - after they
rehydrate me at the emergency room
- is read it again,
this time carefully. I don't know
if I'll have any answers
for you even then. What I do know
is that this is going to
be an incredible, original book -
I want to say
groundbreaking but I'm not sure I
dare; no, I do dare -
and that we got it dirt cheap.
What can I say? It'll be huge.
[Christopher Buckley is editor of
Forbes FYI magazine.
His novel "Trial of the
Millennium" will be published by
Random House in 2003.]
|
|
|
"The
Constitution is
not
an instrument for the
government to restrain
the people, it is an
instrument for the people
to restrain the
government."
---Patrick Henry
|
|
|
Click to make comments or ask questions about
anything on this website.
To contact the
editor, click here: editor@rogueforum.com
|